(page 2)

      It was around this time that reaction to some of the publicity turned sour. Media pundits had noticed, not without some interest, that Haxan Films and Artisan had managed to reach a section of society that it had long been believed were immune from the wily charms of a more conventional marketing campaign- the Generation X and Y'ers. The net literate twenty and thirty somethings had discovered the film by word of mouth and from glowing fan reviews that appeared

Cannibal Holocaust The Last Broadcast

all over the web; but it was number of deliriously positive rantings that appeared in the newsgroups and feedback forums at movie sites, that aroused suspicion that some of them may be as bogus as the film makers, now tongue-in-cheek, assertion to the genuine nature of their movie. Certainly, more seasoned contributors to alt.horror, myself included, noticed that regularly, for a couple of months, glowing one-off posts would be made by people who were never heard of again. Myrick and Sanchez have, however, denied that this method of net marketing was used as a way to promote their film- at least, to their knowledge. There were also charges of plagiarism. Irked by the seemingly universal praise for the film's 'originality', some genre commentators pointed out the uncanny similarity between Myrick and Sanchez's movie and Ruggero Deodato's 1979 film CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST, a film which also uses 'found footage'- this time of a group of mondo film makers who, after much bloodshed of their own making, fall victim to retribution at the hands of a cannibal tribe in the Amazon. Myrick and Sanchez deny being aware of the movie and its main plot device- something which is not unreasonable, as, although the film gained a certain notoriety in the mainstream consciousness in the UK as a 'video-nasty', in the States it remained pretty much an obscure midnight movie. Also, in CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST the 'found footage' is accompanied by scenes, which make up the bulk of the movie, where another film crew go looking for the missing film makers- a dual narrative approach that Myrick and Sanchez rejected. Perhaps more interesting is another low budget film from the States called THE LAST BROADCAST (www.tebweb.com/lastbroadcast/), the plot of which is remarkably similar to THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT. The film, which amazingly cost only $900 and was edited on a home computer by writer-directors Stefan Avalos and Lance Weiler, is the story of a three person cable-TV crew, that go into a forest (the New jersey Pine Barrens) in search of evidence of a legendary monster- the Jersey Devil. The film was slated to appear at the 1998 Sundance film festival (a full year before THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT made its appearance), but was pulled from the schedule for reasons unknown. Both films were shot in 1997, but it is unclear if one influenced the other in any way- THE LAST BROADCAST is in-fact more similar to THE CURSE OF THE BLAIR WITCH psuedodocumentary. Even so, there were rumours that Avalos and Weiler were considering plagiarism charges against the Myrick and Sanchez, but with so many unsubstantiated rumours appearing on the web it is often difficult to separate fact from fiction.

      Despite, or perhaps because of the growing controversies surrounding the film, Artisan quickly became aware that they had a potential hit on their hands; but dealt with the distribution coolly- keen to keep the film's image as an underground sleeper, but all the while increasing its profile in the hope of a cross-over success. The film opened at the Angelika Film Center in New York on July 13th, for an exclusive three day run and, according to the press, caused scenes of near riots during the rush to get tickets. On July 16th the film had a limited opening at 27 cinemas across the US, where, on its opening weekend, it pulled in an incredible $1.5 million- a $57,000 per screen average, which managed to top even THE PHANTOM MENACE's per screen average on its opening weekend. Unable to refrain from comment any longer the mainstream press began to really take notice and a month later, after the film had gone wide to over a thousand screens and
TIME magazine Newsweek magazine
had made an astonishing $50 million in its first week, the film was awarded the US media's highest honour: it made the covers of both Newsweek and Time magazine on the same week. Only an Oscar nomination would be more prestigious; it was a concrete sign, as if it needed one, that THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT was a bone-fide cause celebre. Now, as the movie continues to approach its projected final domestic box office take of $150 million, the BLAIR WITCH phenomena shows no signs of abating. There are already a legion of whispers about sequels or prequels (or both!), which Myrick and Sanchez are sensibly distancing themselves from- at least as writer-directors; their next project is apparently a screwball comedy in the AIRPLANE mould. A stream of merchandising, something more usually associated with the Hollywood big Blockbusters, has blossomed in proportion to the film's success. Not only is there a book, which expands the mythology; a comic; and even a CD with music that whilst none of which actually features in the film, was supposedly taken from a tape found in Josh's car; containing suitably spooky numbers from the likes of The Creatures, Bauhaus and Lydia Lunch. But, as if to go from the sublime to the ridiculous, when you visit the website www.blairwitchdirect.com you can order all the merchandise mentioned online, as well as Blair Witch cigarette cases, ashtrays, beanie hats (as worn by the missing students in the film); and even a pewter chalice with the film's logo emblazoned on it.

      Now, as the film opens on these shores, you could be forgiven for perhaps feeling a little cynical about it in the wake of the charges of plagiarism; opportunistic merchandising; stories of patrons letting out blood curdling screams in US cinemas- or rushing out to be sick (not because the selling of Blair Witchof fear, but rather motion sickness triggered by the shaky-cam nature of the footage); and the general hysteria surrounding the "scariest movie ever made". You'd also be forgiven for wondering if it possibly could live up to this kind of hype? Well, let me just start by saying that no film can possibly live up the type of hype that THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT has been cocooned in, but, paradoxically it almost succeeds. It is a powerfully manipulative, but very fine bit of film making; and, although I realise that I'm adding to the hype by just saying so, it is a film which should not, under any circumstances be missed. From the very start, the rawness of the digital video camera and 16mm footage; and the intimacy of the narrative banishes from the mind all the overblown publicity. THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT is an oddly engaging film. Although we may not have the added angle many viewers had in the States, that the footage was real (the appearance of the three protagonists presenting an MTV music award recently kind of blew any remaining doubt- although there are still a hardcore who insist it really did happen), the footage does seem real. The performances are so natural; the breadth of human emotion evoked so believably, that it is impossible not to become emotionally involved. And, the bottom line, the film is scary. The fore-knowledge that something bad will eventually happen to the student film makers is enough to generate fear and tension from the off; even seemingly innocuous early moments, like the snippet of interview with a Burkittsville housewife, where her toddler trys to cover her mouth to stop her talking about the Blair Witch, are imbued with a horrible sense of foreboding. Believe me, I have never had so many goosebumps as I did during this movie.

      Watching THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT is a draining experience; a filmic endurance test. It is not a film which you can view passively; it does not patronise its audience by providing fully sequential information. By that I mean, we- as the audience, only see, or hear, what Heather, Josh and Mike do, when they have their equipment turned on; sometimes the screen is so dark we can only hear their conversation- or their screams. Sometimes they see or hear things that we do not- their equipment hasn't picked it up, the sound of a baby screaming from deep in the dark woods for example, but we know that they heard it; and we can only imagine what it must have sounded like; and worse, what it can mean. Many people don't 'get' THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT, they are annoyed at the lack of clarity; the resulting ambiguity and the lack of a clear cut resolution; but it is these very qualities which can make the film such a terrifying experience. Forced to use your imagination to fill in the blanks, you can, if you allow yourself to be sucked into the film's pseudo-reality, realise that the horror we imagine awaits the protagonists, is much worse than anything the film makers could show us. They provide us with the visual clues, but they make us work for our numerous chills. And it is this very fact, that we become emotionally involved in the unfolding horror via an unusual intimacy, and growing empathy with the characters, that the film has a haunting resonance long after it finishes. The creeping unease that lasts with the viewer, as horrible ambiguity gives way to terrifying possibilities, can last for days.

      THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT is a fine horror film, which signals a move in the genre back to subtle psychological terror, and away from comic book viscera; something which has long been overdue. In the UK, this is the film to see this Winter.

 

 Relevant Links:

CHAOS MAGAZINE (where this article originally appeared)